Source → concept → original article → learning exercise
David D. Burns, İyi Hissetmek: Yeni Duygudurum Tedavisi. Psikonet Yayınları, 24. Basım, Nisan 2016. ISBN 9789759893729
410 PDF pages and a 16-chapter location map. This selection is not verification of every claim in the book. Concepts and lessons have editorial English translations; full articles are Turkish with English abstracts.
An original reading of task avoidance and activity planning. The article distinguishes the book’s observations from moral judgments, and turns a proposed activity into an open-ended learning experiment rather than a promised cure.
This critical reading separates the reality of an emotional experience from the evidence for an interpretation. It also distinguishes a useful therapeutic focus from a complete causal account of depression.
A critical reading of Burns’s verbal judo. It preserves the source’s empathy–disarming–negotiation sequence while explicitly limiting the teaching activity to safe disagreement and distinguishing understanding from agreement.
A source-literacy essay distinguishing a helpful book, a tested intervention, a theoretical explanation and an individual outcome. It checks the comparator in a bibliotherapy trial and the clinical population in a frequently cited PET study.
An original essay on conditional worth and perfectionism. It separates standards for a task from judgments of human worth and illustrates a low-stakes, fictional experiment without offering a clinical assessment.
A source-based but explicitly editorial distinction between global self-condemnation and specific responsibility. The article does not treat all guilt as pathological and uses a new fictional example to examine evidence, consequences and repair.
Distinguish an observation, emotion or interpretation in a fictional statement.
Distinguish criticism of an action from a global personal label.
Separate a prediction about a task from the observed outcome.
Identify the sample, intervention and comparison condition.
In the book, mental content encompassing how events are perceived, interpreted and given meaning.
Open Concept PassportBurns’s account of structured therapy centred on identifying and reconsidering patterns of thinking associated with emotional difficulties.
Open Concept PassportThe threefold negative appraisal of self, surroundings and future described in the book with reference to Beck.
Open Concept PassportIn the research discussed in the book, an intervention involving reading selected self-help material and working with its exercises.
Open Concept PassportActive personal engagement with the explanations and exercises, which the book also situates alongside professional support when needed.
Open Concept PassportAn appraisal that rapidly comes to mind without deliberate effort; this book focuses especially on negative examples.
Open Concept PassportIn the book’s classification, a pattern of one-sided or exaggerated appraisal when drawing conclusions about events or the self.
Open Concept PassportEvaluating an attribute or performance through one of two extremes while leaving out intermediate degrees.
Open Concept PassportDrawing a much broader, supposedly recurring conclusion from a limited event.
Open Concept PassportAllowing one negative detail to dominate the whole appraisal while other information recedes.
Open Concept PassportMaintaining an existing negative appraisal by dismissing positive information even when it is noticed.
Open Concept PassportReaching a negative conclusion without adequately investigating its support; the book gives mind reading and fortune telling as examples.
Open Concept PassportTreating an assumption about another person’s thoughts as known without checking it.
Open Concept PassportTreating a negative prediction about the future as a settled outcome before it happens.
Open Concept PassportAppraising a mistake, threat or shortcoming as disproportionately important.
Open Concept PassportAppraising a positive attribute, accomplishment or contribution as disproportionately small.
Open Concept PassportTaking the existence of a feeling as sufficient evidence that the associated appraisal is true.
Open Concept PassportDemands that impose inflexible obligations on oneself or others; the book particularly targets unrealistic expectations.
Open Concept PassportTurning a particular behaviour into a global judgment about the whole person rather than describing the behaviour.
Open Concept PassportIntensifying an appraisal by describing an event with inappropriate and emotionally loaded terms.
Open Concept PassportAssuming more responsibility than the evidence supports and confusing influence over others with control over them.
Open Concept PassportThe demeaning or overgeneralized inner commentary toward oneself targeted by the book’s exercises.
Open Concept PassportThe appraisal of oneself as valuable which the book argues should not be reduced to achievement, appearance or others’ approval.
Open Concept PassportMaking personal worth conditional on being loved, successful or flawless, as illustrated by the book’s silent assumptions.
Open Concept PassportThe book’s written exercise separating an automatic thought, the associated distortion and a more realistic response.
Open Concept PassportA recording approach that distinguishes the event, thought, feeling and result of reconsideration.
Open Concept PassportAn alternative thought that re-examines the evidence and proportionality of an appraisal rather than merely offering reassurance.
Open Concept PassportObserving patterns over time by recording selected thoughts; the book describes counting them as one example.
Open Concept PassportDelaying an intended task, which the book argues should not be explained merely by a fixed character label.
Open Concept PassportThe metaphor the book uses for the marked difficulty of initiating activity during depression.
Open Concept PassportStaying away from work, people or potentially satisfying activities in the book’s account of the inactivity cycle.
Open Concept PassportIn the book’s discussion of motivation, the belief that no available action can influence one’s situation.
Open Concept PassportThe negative expectation, discussed in the book, that a present difficulty will continue unchanged into the future.
Open Concept PassportA symptom term explained in the book as reduced capacity to experience pleasure and satisfaction.
Open Concept PassportDividing a task into separate, manageable components rather than treating it as one indivisible burden.
Open Concept PassportThe book’s method of reviewing daily routines by recording planned and actual activities.
Open Concept PassportThe appraisal dimension in the activity record concerned with doing a task or meeting a challenge.
Open Concept PassportThe dimension of the book’s activity record that appraises enjoyment or satisfaction in an activity.
Open Concept PassportComparing an expectation about an activity’s difficulty or value with observations after doing it, as described in the book.
Open Concept PassportDistinguishing and comparing anticipated satisfaction with experienced satisfaction after an activity.
Open Concept PassportAppraisals that obstruct starting or continuing a task in the book’s task-interfering/task-oriented distinction.
Open Concept PassportResponses that redirect attention toward feasible action and proportionate appraisal in the book’s paired distinction.
Open Concept PassportEvaluating performance through the quality of available actions and interactions rather than only the final outcome.
Open Concept PassportWithdrawing from attempts when an unsuccessful outcome is interpreted as a global judgment about the person.
Open Concept PassportApprehension that success cannot be maintained or will create expectations that cannot be met.
Open Concept PassportAvoiding action because a mistake is expected to bring disapproval or rejection.
Open Concept PassportIn the book, responding strongly to obstacles and tending to give up because difficulty is expected not to occur.
Open Concept PassportBurns’s metaphorical label for combining empathy, appropriate agreement and negotiation when responding to criticism.
Open Concept PassportIn the criticism chapter, trying to understand the other perspective through questions that clarify what is meant.
Open Concept PassportIn the book, finding a truthful element or understandable perspective in criticism to reduce defensive conflict.
Open Concept PassportDiscussing a disagreement and one’s perspective without turning it into a global character judgment.
Open Concept PassportTrying out and reviewing responses in fictional conversations in preparation for real interactions.
Open Concept PassportThe name used in the anger chapter for provocative inner commentary that intensifies anger.
Open Concept PassportMore objective and less provocative alternative appraisals proposed in response to hot thoughts.
Open Concept PassportComparing the short- and long-term benefits and costs of maintaining an attitude or making a response.
Open Concept PassportThe concept through which the book discusses mental pictures, alongside verbal thoughts, in emotional experience.
Open Concept PassportThe label used in the anger discussion for noticing a recurring image and redirecting attention to another activity.
Open Concept PassportThe emotion which this chapter particularly links to moving from a specific action to condemning oneself as bad.
Open Concept PassportThe state distinguished from guilt in the book: recognizing harm from an action and turning toward change without global self-condemnation.
Open Concept PassportAn emotion described in the book in relation to realistic appraisal of loss or disappointment.
Open Concept PassportThe historical term used in the book for depression appearing after an identifiable stressful event.
Open Concept PassportThe historical term used in the book when a precipitating stressful event is not readily identified.
Open Concept PassportThe book’s expression for implicit rules or beliefs specifying the conditions attached to personal worth.
Open Concept PassportExploring underlying assumptions by asking what a thought would mean to the person if it were true.
Open Concept PassportThe book’s name for treating others’ approval as a necessary condition of feeling worthy or well.
Open Concept PassportThe book’s label for making completeness or personal worth conditional on being romantically loved.
Open Concept PassportThe concept used when the book discusses tying worth to continual productivity at the expense of other life areas.
Open Concept PassportThe pattern described in the book in which demands for flawlessness impose rigid conditions on appraisal, action and satisfaction.
Open Concept PassportThe book’s label for not performing a habitual response when the urge arises, illustrated through repetitive checking.
Open Concept PassportThe practice illustrated in the final chapter when the therapist also examines personal difficult thoughts and feelings in writing.
Open Concept PassportThe records below are in Turkish and document narrowed or withheld claims. They do not establish whole-book validation.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap düşüncelere güçlü bir nedensel öncelik verir; aynı zamanda genler, hormonlar ve yaşantıların etkisini de anar.
Editoryal karar: Kaynak görüşünü bu gerilimle birlikte anlat. Site sentezinde tek yönlü ve tek nedenli model kurma; WHO etkileşimli çerçevesini ayrı belirt.
Kitap iddiası: Depresyonun her zaman düşünsel çarpıtmadan doğduğu şeklinde mutlak ifadeler bulunur.
Editoryal karar: Mutlak ifadeyi güncel tanım yapma. Bilişsel çalışma bir müdahale odağı olabilir; bütün nedenlerin açıklaması olarak taşınmaz.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap belirli bibliyoterapi araştırmalarından iyileşme yüzdeleri aktarır.
Editoryal karar: Jamison–Scogin özeti 80 yetişkin, az temaslı bibliyoterapi ve bekleme listesi karşılaştırmasını doğrular. Tam metin/payda kontrolü yapılmadığı için yüzdeyi ürün vaadi veya doğrulanmış etki oranı yapma.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap kitap okumanın ilaç veya tam terapi kadar yararlı olabileceğini savunur ve farklı araştırmaları yan yana getirir.
Editoryal karar: Bekleme listesi karşılaştırmasından ilaçla eşdeğerlik çıkarma. Güncel BDT araştırma sentezi ile bu kitabın ve kendi dersimizin etkililiğini birbirinden ayır.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap Baxter ve arkadaşlarının görüntüleme bulgularını yöntemlerin beyni değiştirebileceği tartışmasında kullanır.
Editoryal karar: Atıf yapılan 1992 çalışma OKB örnekleminde glikoz metabolizmasını inceler. Bunu depresyon bibliyoterapisinin veya beyin yapısı değişiminin doğrudan kanıtı yapma.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap puan yorumlamasını teşhis diline yakın biçimde sunar.
Editoryal karar: İçerik metadata düzeyinde kalır. Puanı otomatik tanı ve tedavi seçim ekranına dönüştürme; kapsamlı değerlendirme notu ekle.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap bazı intihar maddelerine ayrı dikkat çekse de toplam puanları yardım kararlarıyla ilişkilendirir.
Editoryal karar: Kendi alıştırmalarımızda klinik puan veya risk seviyesi yok. Düşük puanla güvenlik garantisi verilmez.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap normal sağlık değerlendirmesinden duygusal köken çıkarımına yaklaşır.
Editoryal karar: Başka nedenin bulunmamış olmasını psikolojik nedenin ispatı gibi yazma; yeni veya süren bedensel yakınmaları bu kitapla açıklama.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap kontrolü kaybetmekten korkan okura bazı ciddi durumların kesin olmayacağı yönünde güvence verir.
Editoryal karar: Bu kesin dışlamayı taşımama kararı. Tek bir düşünce üzerinden kişiye tanı koyma veya tanı dışlama yapılmaz.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap mani süresini ve tedavisini genelleyici biçimde açıklar.
Editoryal karar: Bu pasajı güncel tanı ölçütü ya da ilaç önerisi olarak kullanma; ayrıntılı klinik güncellik kontrolü ayrı iş olarak açık.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap bazı duyguları çarpıtılmış düşünce ürünü olarak geçersiz veya istenmeyen diye niteler.
Editoryal karar: Kaynak ifadeyi gizleme; kendi öğretim metninde duygu yaşantısının varlığını kabul et, dış dünya hakkındaki çıkarımın kanıtını ayrı incele.
Kitap iddiası: Bir tartışmayı açıklamak için okurun bedensel acı denemesi yapmasını isteyen bir örnek bulunur.
Editoryal karar: Yöntem ayrıntılarını alıntılama veya eğitim alıştırmasına taşıma; fiziksel zarar içermeyen yeni örnekler kullan.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap tembellik etiketine itiraz eder; bazı başka pasajlarda ise istememeyi suçlayıcı ifadeler kullanır.
Editoryal karar: Her iki tarafı kaynak okumasında ayır. Kendi metninde irade veya çalışkanlık üzerinden kişinin ahlaki değerini puanlama.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap eleştiri karşısında empati ve silahsızlandırmayı geniş durumlara önerir.
Editoryal karar: Bunu istismar, tehdit ve zorlamaya katlanma kuralı yapma. Kurgu eğitimleri sıradan ve güvenli görüş ayrılıklarıyla sınırla.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap sıcak düşünce ve canlandırmalar üzerinden öfkeyi ele alır; bazı neden ifadeleri kişiyi tümüyle sorumlu tutar.
Editoryal karar: Bu bir kaynak modelidir. Öfkenin tüm nedenleri veya mağdurun sorumluluğu hakkında evrensel açıklama üretme.
Kitap iddiası: Bağımlılık sözcüğü özdeğerin onaya veya romantik sevgiye bağlanmasını anlatır.
Editoryal karar: Bu kullanım otomatik klinik tanı veya bağımlılık ölçeği değildir; kaynak kavramı olarak etiketle. Bağ kurma ihtiyacını hastalık sayma.
Kitap iddiası: Yazar ölçeğin tamamını vermediğini, bazı tutumları seçip yenilerini eklediğini belirtir.
Editoryal karar: 35 maddelik kitap sürümünü başka bir DAS/İTÖ sürümüyle eşitleme. Maddeleri, puanlamayı ve hak durumunu ayrı tut.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap tek bir alıştırmanın bazen kalıcı değişim sağlayabileceğini söyler.
Editoryal karar: Bunu herkes için süre veya sonuç garantisi yapma. ERP’nin klinik çerçevesi ayrı kaynakla sınırlı olarak kontrol edildi.
Kitap iddiası: Bir konuşma sonrasında büyük rahatlama anlatılır; anlatıcı kişi için daha sonra hastası olmadığını belirtir.
Editoryal karar: Vaka anlatısını kontrollü etkililik deneyi veya genellenebilir iyileşme oranı gibi kullanma.
Kitap iddiası: Kitap bibliyoterapiyi çok düşük maliyetli ve yan etkisiz diye sunar.
Editoryal karar: Bütün okurlar için zararsızlık garantisi benimsenmedi. Alıştırmalar zorunlu değil; kötüleşmeyi kişisel başarısızlık diye yorumlamayacak şekilde yazıldı.
Scales are referenced as metadata only. Protected items, scoring keys, book scans and patient stories are not published. The four visual briefs are not finished illustrations.