How we write.

Different kinds of knowledge

We distinguish source-supported description, contemporary research, historical accounts, psychoanalytic theory and editorial interpretation. A historical explanation is not automatically current clinical evidence.

A traceable process

We identify the source, read its scope and limits, write an original explanation and attach references. Entries state their review status. Source and editorial checks do not mean independent clinical approval. Automated tools can support drafting and validation; they are not authorities for factual claims.

Dates and corrections

A source publication date, our access date and an editorial check date describe different events. We retain that distinction. Unsupported claims are removed or revised; a broken source link does not justify inventing a replacement reference.

Editorial independence

Commercial relationships do not convert a claim into evidence. Relevant conflicts or sponsorship must be stated alongside the affected material. No paid recommendation or testimonial is implied by a source link.